Use case over label
Separate “software company” from the specific workflow or need that makes an account relevant.
The same industry can contain companies with completely different workflows, maturity and buying triggers. Arcton segments the market by real use case, qualifies accounts and maps the buying committee behind the purchase.

Revenue, operations or functional leadership; IT, data, security or engineering; product and innovation; finance or procurement where relevant; founder-led routes in smaller companies.
For a workflow-led software question, we would first define the operational trigger, identify companies showing that context, validate the current workflow and then map economic buyer, functional owner, technical evaluator and champion. This is a methodology example, not a claimed campaign result.
Separate “software company” from the specific workflow or need that makes an account relevant.
Funding, hiring and product signals support qualification; they do not replace evidence of fit.
Map the person who owns the outcome, evaluates the product and can move the purchase forward.
Yes. Workflow, operating context and buying trigger are often more useful inclusion rules than an industry code.
They can support a decision, but they are not the sole reason an account is included.
Yes. Outputs can distinguish economic buyers, functional owners, technical evaluators and champions.
Not yet. The page deliberately uses a non-quantified methodology example until an audited SaaS case is approved.
Give us one use case, geography and buying context to test.